ICONOS FINALES-TRAZADOS

Abusive clauses

Translation generated by AI. Access the original version

Ultra partes effect of collective actions on the restitution of amounts paid

Abusive clauses

The Supreme Court (TS) has ruled in favor of consumers who requested the bank to refund them the mortgage expenses that they had paid due to a clause that obligated them to assume all the costs of the contract. At the time, these borrowers signed a mortgage loan with a condition that charged them all the expenses , and that is why they went to court asking for two things, to declare null that clause (as abusive) and for the bank to refund what they had paid, in addition to the interests.

In the first instance, the judge declared the clause null and void and sentenced the bank to refund the expenses with interests. The bank appealed, but with an important nuance, it was no longer arguing that the clause was abusive. What it was trying to do was to avoid payment by alleging that the refund claim was time-barred (meaning that the deadline to claim had passed).

The entity argued that the deadline to claim should start counting from when a previous collective judgment became final previous class action that had declared the nullity of that same clause with "ultra partes" effect (i. e., beyond the individuals who participated in that trial). According to the bank, since that abuse had already "notorious" from that moment on, the time to claim would have started earlier.

But the Supreme Court does not accept that approach because, even if there is a collective judgment declaring the nullity with general effect , that does not automatically mean that the deadline for each person to claim the return of the money starts running. The restitution is an individual action and the decisive factor is that the consumer has effective and concrete knowledge that their clause is abusive. Therefore, the Supreme Court rejects basing this start on a supposed "notoriety" derived from specialized judicial judgments or actions.

If you are thinking of carrying out any type of operation or business that includes the formalization of a real estate credit contract, our professionals can advise you on the defense of your interests

Newsletter

* Required fields

Personal data protection.


Data controller: IBERMARK CONSULTING INTERNACIONAL S.L,
,

The purpose of processing your data is to send you informative and commercial communications, based on your consent, given when you provide your data (article 6.1.a, RGPD).
You may exercise the following rights over your data,

  • The right of information, access, rectification, objection, erasure ("to be forgotten"), restriction of
    processing, portability, non-transferability, to the limitation of processing, portability, not to be subject to automated individual decisions.
  • Remember that exercising your rights is free of charge. You can also lodge a complaint with the
    supervisory authority.

You can access the legal notice and the complete information here


Drag the arrow into the white box to activate the button